Am I missing something? Where in this report are any individuals actually named? My understanding was that they're using initials in place of names specifically because they want to _avoid_ naming anyone.
The original versions of the document had names. Those were later replaced with initials.
I think the issue was in part that this document didn't appear to be a public "here's what's going on doc" as much as it was a doc they seemed to be using as a focal point for their own coordination efforts.
