Hacker Newsnew | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submitlogin

As we speak there is huge Hindu Muslim Riot going on in Delhi which was instigated by one of the BJP leader.


[flagged]


> The law helps State-sanctioned-persecuted religious minorities from neighboring countries

If I recall the law in question correctly, it helps members of certain religious sects, while managing to exclude the one religious sect that is actually being actively persecuted by its government on a massive scale--the Muslim Rohingyas in Burma.


> actively persecuted by its government

persecuted by government and persecuted by State-sanction(Constitution) are different. One government could decide it hates X group and persecute them, it doesn't mean the constitution of that country supports it.


[flagged]


[flagged]


> Bold claim considering radical Islam is responsible for most of terrorist acts in the world.

Using https://www.start.umd.edu/sites/default/files/publications/l... as my data source, I don't think radical Islam is responsible for a majority of terrorist acts. A plurality, yes; but they don't cross the 50% threshold I think. Note that half of the organizations responsible for more than 100 attacks each are not Islamist organization.


Anybody can protest anything.

By your logic, those who are 'protesting' in support of the CAA must also be allowed to occupy public highways and disrupt everyone's lives.

Just because democracy tolerates protests, it doesn't make the protestors automatically correct or moral.

The 'minority' protestors are against a law that actually helps minorities of their neighboring countries. The hypocrisy is high.




Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: