Hacker Newsnew | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submitlogin

This isn't actually the case. That policy was part of a set of changes that were meant to go into effect in July but that Apple rolled back. You're allowed to charge a different price but you can't tell the user that they can get it cheaper elsewhere or that you're paying 30% to Apple.


Man, I thought the first one was damning, but uh, this second explanation is just more plain non-competitive behavior.




Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: