Hacker Newsnew | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submitlogin

When I wanted to write application, I used Swing and I didn’t find it horrible. Quite the opposite. I didn’t care about the looks, though, it was not a major concern. That was before Java 8. I could imagine that writing callbacks would be even easier with lambdas.

When people don’t laugh at Electron applications, I don’t know what could be wrong with Swing. Nobody cares about native toolkits anymore (what is native toolkit for Windows or Linux?).



Yeah well, " I didn’t care about the looks, though, it was not a major concern"

There is the difference. This post is for people who do care about the looks. (or do care, that their users care) Some users don't care, which is fine to serve them, what they want, but most actually do.

"When people don’t laugh at Electron applications, I don’t know what could be wrong with Swing"

People do not laugh at electron apps, because they use html which is designed for good looking. In other words, usually much better looking. It is just not performant, unless you use native modules etc.

And native toolkits are still a thing. Gtk for linux for example.

Personally I also care about the looks, but I prefer function over form, meaning I want a functioning app first and secondly it should look good. But I like to have both.


HTML isn't designed for good looking. The default stylesheet for HTML is impossibly ugly. Heck look at HN, hardly a thing of beauty.

However, most people do a lot of work to make web sites and apps attractive. You can do that work with Swing or JavaFX too. I've done it before, it was fine, I ended up with a modern web-ish feel to the UI.


By now, html is totally designed to be good looking. Look at all the amount of work, that went into CSS and co.

Things that cost me a line in CSS, like text-shadow, probably would require me to implement a shader libary in swing.


In Swing, yeah. Swing focuses very much on boring business-type UI.

Not in JavaFX where such shaders are pre-canned and there's a CSS dialect too. I wrote my web-like app in JavaFX. It was no big deal.


> And native toolkits are still a thing. Gtk for linux for example.

You mean Qt?


I don't know why you got down-modded so much. There is no official "native" toolkit for Linux; Qt is just as native as GTK.


gtk is not native (there are no native widgets on X Window System & family)


It's native to a user's desktop full of Gtk programs.

If there were a complete Swing desktop environment, Swing apps would be native to that environment. But even Sun's Java Desktop System was based on GNOME.


> I want a functioning app first and secondly it should look good

One thing to keep in mind is that you want a functioning app first with less than great GUI but then you also want an app that is "skinnable" in other words it should be easy to replace the look and feel without having to touch the application code. CSS-stylesheets attempt to accomplish that.


Electron performance is a lot better than Swing in terms of latency and startup time. Electron may use a lot of memory or whatever but that doesn't really matter; how fast it feels to the user is what matters. Meanwhile even basic Swing applications tend to come with a splash screen like they think they're Photoshop (remember Azureus, a freaking torrent client that took about 10s to start up?).




Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: