>Physical access doesn't mean access to a meaningful data if it is properly encrypted
And what is properly encrypted if you can take advantage of 0-day vulns to unlock the phone so you have access to the data in an unencrypted state. You're not playing this through to the end of what physical access to the device means.
These risks are valid for any device, it has nothing to do with Apple or the feature in question. The police can have a physical access to your devices with or without implementation of this feature.
I don't understand what are you arguing for, physical access is not a software thing and it is guarded by exactly the same mechanism that guard the access to you apple(the fruit) in your fridge.
And what is properly encrypted if you can take advantage of 0-day vulns to unlock the phone so you have access to the data in an unencrypted state. You're not playing this through to the end of what physical access to the device means.