Hacker Newsnew | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submitlogin

Then why wouldn't they say, "the government asked us to do this"? Apple is taking all the negative publicity this way.

My favorite theory is this:

Apple wants to create a chilling effect on reverse engineering iOS. They're starting to catch regulatory attention and lost their recent suit against Corellium. By putting neural hashes in the encrypted OS image, they can accuse anyone who reverse engineers iOS of:

1. Being in cahoots with child abusers

2. Knowingly possessing CSAM

I would hope that most courts would see through that paper thin logic, but the idea would be simply to introduce enough doubt that most reverse engineers don't want to risk it.



> Then why wouldn't they say, "the government asked us to do this"?

NSLs are routinely issued to silence companies.


Oh, you're so close... what was the rest of the context?

It was that Apple somehow gets negotiating leverage with a three letter agency.

So how does Apple get negotiating leverage in a context with a TLA when they can't say "they made us do it"?


they could be under a gag order which would mean if they did mention anything about the government they could get into deep shit


I can't imagine how the gag order would allow Apple to announce a CSAM scanning system but not announce that the government forced them to.

What basis could there be for that? And I'd be even more skeptical if this originated from a single case of abuse.


Sure, but look at the context. The hypothesis was that Apple was doing this to create negotiating leverage with some three letter agency.

How does Apple get leverage if Apple gets all the negative publicity, and can't even say "TLA made us do it"?




Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: