Hacker Newsnew | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submitlogin

The ruby 3.0 binary is 19MB so I would assume at least that big. I don't think there would be really any downsides to packing it in since the chance of the user having two ruby programs using the same ruby version are close to 0 anyway.


I wonder if this could be combined with something like Sorbet Compiler[1] to help with final size?

Personally I think I’d favour small static builds over linked binaries.

1. https://sorbet.org/blog/2021/07/30/open-sourcing-sorbet-comp...




Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: