> Apple must treat it as a cost of business at this point.
As should every company, because it is. Not saying Apple SHOULDN'T make decent equipment, but nothing is perfect so these things just have to be part of the accounting/business plan. They clearly are relying on their customers' brand loyalty as part of that calculation, and that + cheaping out or whatever else is causing these bi-annual issues is clearly more profit than fixing them.
2009 (macbook display): https://www.crn.com/news/components-peripherals/222100056/ju...
2012 (Iphone display): https://www.cnet.com/tech/tech-industry/judge-tosses-lawsuit...
2013 (macbook motherboard): https://www.law360.com/commercialcontracts/articles/485286/a...
2015 (macbook motherboard): https://appleinsider.com/articles/15/01/09/judge-dismisses-l...
2017 (using refurbished parts): https://www.courthousenews.com/judge-kills-apple-warranty-cl...
2019 (butterfly keyboard): https://www.girardsharp.com/newsroom-news-apple-keyboard-ord...
All of them are dismissed. The last one got settled for $50 million, which is peanuts.
Edit: looks like the judge already dismissed this new one too...
https://www.docketalarm.com/cases/California_Northern_Distri...
(technically a different class action lawsuit, but it alleges the same facts)