Hacker Newsnew | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submitlogin

rxi, lite's original author, considers lite to be complete, and isn't accepting new feature prs, which is fair enough.

lite-xl was forked to keep the same general principle of simplicity but going a bit further with features.



So, keep it simple, but make it juuuust a little bit more complicated?


Original lite is a clean and elegant Lua implementation of text editor with quite a few features. Lite-xl does the last mile to better integrate with OS and does many features that were out of scope of lite, for example multiple cursors. In that sense lite-xl is like you say a bit more complicated, to make it actually useful for everyday tasks.

I use lite embedded in my own application, and lite-xl as a quick and competent note-taking application (with custom plugin to set filename to date + document header). Both are great to me in their own ways.


Yeah, lol. It's a balancing act. Ideally we give it just enough juice to allow for things like native plugins, and the easy expected core stuff like nice font rendering , process management, multicursors, etc.. and then leave the rest to a really robust plugin ecosystem that wasn't possible to the same degree under lite.




Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: