VCs won’t invest if they know this is your plan? If you lie to them and keep going for 500k, they can sue you for scamming (or whatever legal term is).
"I initially planned to scale but eventually realized the company wouldn't make enough to survive, as happens to most startups. I chose to scale down and make the company profitable instead of killing it." Could the VCs really argue against that in court? It's well-known that most startups fail without any scamming.
I don't think you even need to go to court over this. If you have a reasonably good relationship with your VCs you can just offer to buy them out with a small premium on their investment. They see how the business is going too and most are not looking to hold you on their portfolio forever for no reason.
It seems like VCs will often sell shares for a near-total-loss on their investment, for simplicity and relationship with founders, and they can write it off[0].
How is there any fraud here? You took seed money, built a profitable company and it just can’t scale to a unicorn. That isn’t fraud and no court would consider it as such
How is it not fraud to initially represent to investors that you plan to scale to the moon while planning all along to later say that you decided it wasn't going to work out?
What your mental plan is doesn't matter though, as long as you actually made a reasonable effort towards what the VCs expect. Or does anyone actually tell them "invest in me because I'll overtake Nvidia or die trying"?
I guess the person taking the VC deal isn't actually against getting filthy rich if they have a chance. If you say "I think this can get big", burn cash and work hard for a while, then recognize the moment where it's not sustainable anymore and scale down, then you did what was expected.
Of course it does. It makes the difference between being wrong and being a liar.
>I guess the person taking the VC deal isn't actually against getting filthy rich if they have a chance. If you say "I think this can get big", burn cash and work hard for a while, then recognize the moment where it's not sustainable anymore and scale down, then you did what was expected.
But if at the time you said that you actually neither believed it could get big nor intended to try to make it big, you've committed fraud even if the ultimate outcome is expected.
Former Silicon Valley lawyer here. It would be very difficult for a VC to win such a case, and it would almost certainly not be worth it for them given the amount of damages at issue.
It would also hurt their reputation by making it seem like they got duped by some founder.
Again, this requires them having a majority stake and we’re discussing YC which is a seed round. The current company I work at is YC backed and the founder still controls 85% of the company
